Swenson v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
最近更新时间:2025-07-18
案件信息
案件号:ilnd-1:2025-cv-01909
状态:open
提交时间:2025-03-20 00:00:00
诉讼类型:
律所:
原告:Swenson v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
# | 日期 | 案件进程 |
14 | 2025-03-20 | MAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC |
13 | 2025-03-19 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel: The Court previously questioned the propriety of joinder and ordered the plaintiff to file either a supplemental memorandum addressing joinder or an amended complaint on or before March 12, 2025. The plaintiff failed to file either. Therefore, the Court dismisses this case, without prejudice, for misjoinder. The Court reminds the plaintiff of Local Rule 40.3, which states "When a case is dismissed with prejudice or without, and a second case is filed involving the same parties and relating to the same subject matter, the second case shall be assigned to the judge to whom the first case was assigned. The designation sheet presented at the time the second case is filed shall indicate the number of the earlier case and the name of the judge to whom it was assigned." Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. |
12 | 2025-02-26 | NOTICE of Correction regarding [7]. |
11 | 2025-02-26 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel: The plaintiff has filed a complaint alleging infringement by 202 defendants. This case follows a pattern common to "Schedule A" cases where plaintiffs allege that defendants employ similar methods and "work in active concert" to infringe plaintiffs' intellectual property. But experience has shown that not all defendants named in a Schedule A case work together. More importantly, experience has shown that joinder under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20 is rarely appropriate in Schedule A cases. Accordingly, the Court raises the propriety of joinder and requires the plaintiff to file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder on or before March 12, 2025. Alternatively, by the same date, the plaintiff may file an amended complaint naming one or more defendants; however, if the plaintiff names multiple defendants, the plaintiff must show that joinder of those defendants is proper. All pending motions are hereby stayed pending resolution of the joinder issue. Mailed notice. |
10 | 2025-02-25 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). |
9 | 2025-02-25 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
8 | 2025-02-25 | MAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC. |
7 | 2025-02-25 | MAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC. |
6 | 2025-02-24 | COMPLAINT filed by Swenson; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23126087. |
5 | 2025-02-24 | Exhibit |
4 | 2025-02-24 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Swenson Schedule A to Complaint |
3 | 2025-02-24 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
2 | 2025-02-24 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Swenson by David Lee Gulbransen, Jr |
1 | 2025-02-24 | MOTION by Plaintiff Swenson to seal document sealed document[2] |