Bigfoot 4X4, Inc. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A Hereto
最近更新时间：2025-07-17
案件信息
案件号：ilnd-1:2025-cv-07222
状态：open
提交时间：2025-07-03 00:00:00
诉讼类型：
律所：
原告：Bigfoot 4X4, Inc. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A Hereto
| # | 日期 | 案件进程 |
| 1 | 2025-07-03 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge LaShonda A. Hunt. Plaintiff names 90 Defendants in this single case 9. However, after reviewing the complaint 1 and other filings, the Court questions whether Plaintiff has established sufficient grounds for joinder of all Defendants. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2); Viking Arm AS v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 24 C 1566, 2024 WL 2953105 (N.D. Ill. June 6, 2024). In addition, because Plaintiff filed a form complaint with generic allegations about "Defendant Internet Stores" allegedly violating federal trademark laws without any details whatsoever about the defendants identified in Schedule A, the Court doubts that the complaint satisfies the requirements of with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8 and 10. Accordingly, by 7/17/25, Plaintiff must either (a) file an amended complaint and an amended Schedule A under seal with a subset of Defendants, and the amended complaint must set forth with specific allegations about each defendant identified in Plaintiff's amended Schedule A, including allegations that explain how each defendant is properly joined with each other and labeled exhibits that contain screenshots or other information specific to Defendants listed on amended Schedule A only; or (b) file a supplemental memorandum that refers to specific facts alleged in its filings and provides citations to specific screenshots associated with each Schedule A Defendant to demonstrate that joinder is proper and the allegations are sufficient under Rules 8 and 10. Otherwise, this case will be dismissed. Counsel is admonished to review and comply with all court procedures and applicable rules. Plaintiff's motion to seal 8 remains under advisement. Finally, the motion hearing set for 7/9/25 12 is stricken, and the Court notes that 7/9/25 is listed on the Court's webpage as a date on which motions are not to be noticed for presentment. Counsel is reminded to review the Court's schedule before noticing motions for presentment. Mailed notice (gel,) |
